Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516267›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2017

Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material.

Martina Mahelová, Filip Růžička

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Septic arthritis caused byMedical mycology case reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Candida dubliniensis fungemia in a patient with severe COVID-19: A case report.Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martina MahelováDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
Filip RůžičkaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic. ruzicka.filip@fnusa.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5679-0513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida dubliniensis was reported as a new species in 1995. This species is often misidentified as Candida albicans. The aims of this work were to determine the occurrence of C. dubliniensis in various clinical materials, to evaluate several ways to identify it and to examine the genetic variability of isolates. Among 7706 isolates originally identified as C. albicans, 237 were identified as C. dubliniensis (3.1%). Most of the C. dubliniensis isolates were obtained from the upper and lower respiratory tract (61.4 and 22.9%). Five phenotypic methods including latex agglutination were used (cultivation on CHROMagar Candida, on Staib agar, at 42 °C and in medium with 6.5% NaCl), but only cultivation on the medium with an increased concentration of NaCl and latex agglutination gave reliable results. Species-specific polymerase chain reaction was used as the confirmation method. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry provided less reliable results. In fact, 78.9% of C. dubliniensis isolates had scores above 1.7. However, the rest of them (21.1%) were also identified as C. dubliniensis even when the scores were lower than 1.7. Divergences among C. dubliniensis strains were evaluated by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Eighty-six selected C. dubliniensis isolates showed a 69.6% level of similarity. The results of this study expand the knowledge of the incidence, means of identification and genotypic divergence of C. dubliniensis isolates.

Indexed as

CandidaCandidiasisElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenetic VariationGenotypeHumansLatex Fixation TestsMicrobiological TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSodium ChlorideSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationTemperatureSodium Chloride

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.