ArticleDer Internist2017
[Choosing wisely recommendations in angiology].
Article in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Choosing wisely initiative addresses measures of high medical impact which are frequently not appropriately performed according to expert opinion.
objectiveTo increase the quality of indications by providing supportive information on diagnostic and therapeutic measures in the field of angiology. MATERIALS AND
methodsAs part of the Choosing wisely initiative, the German Society of Angiology has constructed five positive recommendations on underused measures and five negative recommendations concerning those possibly overused. The recommendations were validated by the twelve professional societies of the German Society of Internal Medicine in a consensus conference. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The recommendations cover a broad spectrum of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, such as the role of ultrasound examinations in vascular diseases, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, diagnosis and therapy of peripheral artery disease (PAD), investigation of chronic ulcers, therapy of varicosis, and finally, the problems associated with using anticoagulants in PAD or thrombosis. By discussing the evidence, we aim to demonstrate that not all medically possible measures are actually appropriate in every situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.