Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516236›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2017

Identification of patients at risk of non-adherence to oral antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis using the Compliance Questionnaire in Rheumatology: an ARCO sub-study.

Carlos Marras, Indalecio Monteagudo, Georgina Salvador, Francisco J de Toro, Alejandro Escudero, Juan J Alegre-Sancho, Enrique Raya, Ana Ortiz, Loreto Carmona, Yvonne Mestre and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Carlos MarrasHospital Universitario Virgen de Arrixaca, Calle Polideportivo, 5, 30120, Murcia, Spain. cmarras2002@yahoo.es.
Indalecio MonteagudoHospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Georgina SalvadorHospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco J de ToroHospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Alejandro EscuderoHospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Juan J Alegre-SanchoHospital Universitario Dr Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Enrique RayaHospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
Ana OrtizHospital Universitario La Princesa, IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Loreto CarmonaInstituto de Salud Musculoesquelética, Madrid, Spain.
Yvonne MestreMedical Affairs, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Cea-CalvoMedical Affairs, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime Calvo-AlénHospital Txagorritxu, Araba, Vitoria, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ARCO study (Study on Adherence of Rheumatoid Arthritis patients to SubCutaneous and Oral Drugs), a multicenter, non-interventional retrospective study, was primarily designed to assess the percentage of patients [aged ≥18 years with an established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis] with non-adherence to prescribed subcutaneous biologicals. This paper reports data for the secondary objective from a subset of patients, namely to evaluate non-adherence to prescribed oral antirheumatic drugs in RA patients in Spain using the validated Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology (CQR). Patients also completed the Morisky-Green Medication Adherence Questionnaire, Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, and a questionnaire (developed and validated in Spain) on patient satisfaction with RA treatment and preferences. A total of 271 patients (76.7% females; mean age 55.6 years) were being treated with oral drugs for RA, of which 234 completed the CQR questionnaire. Non-adherence was reported in 49/234 (20.9%) patients. The proportion of non-adherence in younger patients (aged ≤48 years; 37.5%) was double that recorded in patients aged >48 years (p = 0.006). Patients with a perception of lower efficacy also had a higher risk of non-adherence (p = 0.012). Multivariable analysis showed that younger age and male gender were independently associated with risk of non-adherence. There was only slight agreement between the CQR and Morisky-Green assessment tools (kappa coefficient = 0.186), possibly reflecting the fact that both questionnaires measure slightly different aspects of medication adherence. In conclusion, one out of five RA patients was identified as at risk for non-adherence with the CQR, and this was more frequent in younger patients and in males.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceSurveys and QuestionnairesAdministration, OralAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidChi-Square DistributionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRetrospective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsAdherenceNon-adherenceOral medicationQuestionnaireRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.