ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017
[Is there still a role for active surveillance in prostate cancer?]
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term data demonstrate a higher oncological risk associated with active surveillance (AS) than initially anticipated. In particular, patients with more than two tumor-involved biopsy cores and/or Gleason-7a foci must be regarded as having an increased risk of developing an incurable stage of disease after an initial attempt of AS. For patients with Gleason-7a foci, the 15-year risk of suffering from an incurable tumor stage is reported as high as 60%. Furthermore, life expectancy must be regarded as one of the major risk factors to finally develop symptomatic incurable disease. A discussion has therefore started as to whether a high life expectancy should be regarded as an exclusion criterion against AS. An estimated life expectancy exceeding 15 or 20 years has been proposed for patients suffering from Gleason 7a or 6 foci at initial biopsy, respectively. Furthermore, it must be expected that a number of molecular risk factors will gain importance in the near future for the decision-making process for or against AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28516190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.