Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516172›Full record

ArticleCSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work2017

Supporting Patient-Provider Collaboration to Identify Individual Triggers using Food and Symptom Journals.

Jessica Schroeder, Jane Hoffswell, Chia-Fang Chung, James Fogarty, Sean Munson, Jasmine Zia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Information visualizations of symptom information for patients and providers: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Exploring Collaboration Breakdowns Between Provider Teams and Patients in Post-Surgery Care.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  6. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MigraineTracker: Examining Patient Experiences with Goal-Directed Self-Tracking for a Chronic Health Condition.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Designing Flexible Longitudinal Regimens: Supporting Clinician Planning for Discontinuation of Psychiatric Drugs.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Automated vs. Human Health Coaching: Exploring Participant and Practitioner Experiences.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica SchroederComputer Science & Engineering, DUB Group, University of Washington.
Jane HoffswellComputer Science & Engineering, DUB Group, University of Washington.
Chia-Fang ChungHuman Centered Design & Engineering, DUB Group, University of Washington.
James FogartyComputer Science & Engineering, DUB Group, University of Washington.
Sean MunsonHuman Centered Design & Engineering, DUB Group, University of Washington.
Jasmine ZiaDivision of Gastroenterology, DUB Group, University of Washington.

Funding

Sharing Patient Lifelog Data with the Primary Care Team for Two Patient Populations: Preventative Care & Chronic Disease ManagementR21HS023654 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MUNSON, SEAN · 2014 to 2015
$297k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS023654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-generated data can allow patients and providers to collaboratively develop accurate diagnoses and actionable treatment plans. Unfortunately, patients and providers often lack effective support to make use of such data. We examine patient-provider collaboration to interpret patient-generated data. We focus on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a chronic illness in which particular foods can exacerbate symptoms. IBS management often requires patient-provider collaboration using a patient's food and symptom journal to identify the patient's triggers. We contribute interactive visualizations to support exploration of such journals, as well as an examination of patient-provider collaboration in interpreting the journals. Drawing upon individual and collaborative interviews with patients and providers, we find that collaborative review helps improve data comprehension and build mutual trust. We also find a desire to use tools like our interactive visualizations within and beyond clinic appointments. We discuss these findings and present guidance for the design of future tools.

Indexed as

H.5.2 Information Interfaces and PresentationInteractive VisualizationPatient-Generated DataPatient-Provider CollaborationSelf-TrackingSymptom TriggersUser Interfaces

Identifiers

PMID28516172
PMCPMC5432206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.