Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516107›Full record

ReviewNeurogenesis (Austin, Tex.)2017

Building a central nervous system: The neural stem cell lineage revealed.

Wenjun Xu, Nishanth Lakshman, Cindi M Morshead

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurogenesis (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Experimental Neurogenesis in the Embryos of the Gecko Paroedura picta.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. PPAR Gamma and Viral Infections of the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Neurobiology of zinc and its role in neurogenesis.European journal of nutrition · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenjun XuDepartment of Surgery, Division of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nishanth LakshmanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cindi M MorsheadDepartment of Surgery, Division of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) are a multipotent, self-renewing source of undifferentiated cells in the periventricular region of the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). Since their original discovery 25 years ago, much has been learned about their development, persistence, localization, properties and potential. Herein we discuss the current state of knowledge pertaining to neural stem cells with a focus on the lineage relationship between two NSC populations along the neuraxis and their regionally distinct niches in the CNS.

Indexed as

adult stem cellscentral canaldevelopmentforebraininjuryneural stem cellsspinal cordstem cell lineagestem cell nichesubventricular zone

Identifiers

PMID28516107
PMCPMC5424705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.