ReviewIntrinsically disordered proteins
Digested disorder: Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (January/February/March, 2013).
Review in Intrinsically disordered proteins. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (April-May-June, 2014).Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2017Article
- Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (January-February-March, 2014).Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2016Article
- Unreported intrinsic disorder in proteins: Disorder emergency room.Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2015Article
- Digested disorder, Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (October-November-December, 2013).Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2015Article
- Digested disorder: Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (July-August-September, 2013).Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2014Review
- Unreported intrinsic disorder in proteins: Building connections to the literature on IDPs.Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2014Article
- Digested disorder: Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (April-May-June, 2013).Intrinsically disordered proteinsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current literature on intrinsically disordered proteins is blooming. A simple PubMed search for "intrinsically disordered protein OR natively unfolded protein" returns about 1,800 hits (as of June 17, 2013), with many papers published quite recently. To keep interested readers up to speed with this literature, we are starting a "Digested Disorder" project, which will encompass a series of reader's digest type of publications aiming at the objective representation of the research papers and reviews on intrinsically disordered proteins. The only two criteria for inclusion in this digest are the publication date (a paper should be published within the covered time frame) and topic (a paper should be dedicated to any aspect of protein intrinsic disorder). The current digest covers papers published during the period of January, February and March of 2013. The papers are grouped hierarchically by topics they cover, and for each of the included paper a short description is given on its major findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.