Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515944›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2017

Identifying baseline immune-related biomarkers to predict clinical outcome of immunotherapy.

Sacha Gnjatic, Vincenzo Bronte, Laura Rosa Brunet, Marcus O Butler, Mary L Disis, Jérôme Galon, Leif G Hakansson, Brent A Hanks, Vaios Karanikas, Samir N Khleif and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sacha GnjaticDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, S5-105, 1470 Madison Avenue, Box 1128, New York, NY 10029 USA.
Vincenzo BronteHead of Immunology Section, University of Verona, Piazzale Le L. A. Scuro, 10, Verona, Italy.
Laura Rosa BrunetImmodulon Therapeutics Ltd, Stockley Park, 6-9 The Square, Uxbridge, UK.
Marcus O ButlerPrincess Margaret Hospital/Ontario Cancer Institute, RM 9-622, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON Canada.
Mary L DisisUniversity of Washington, Tumor Vaccine Group, 850 Mercer Street, Box 358050, Seattle, WA 98109 USA.
Jérôme GalonINSERM - Cordeliers Research Center, Integrative Cancer Immunology Laboratory, 15 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, Paris, France.
Leif G HakanssonCanImGuide Therapeutics AB, Domkyrkovägen 23, Hoellviken, Sweden.
Brent A HanksDuke University Medical Center, 308 Research Drive, LSRC, Room C203, Box 3819, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Vaios KaranikasRoche Innovation Center Zurich, Wagistrasse 18, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Samir N KhleifGeorgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, 1120 15th Street, CN-2101A, Augusta, GA 30912 USA.
John M KirkwoodUniversity of Pittsburgh, Hillman Cancer Center-Research Pavilion, 5117 Centre Avenue, Suite 1.32, Pittsburg, PA 15213 USA.
Lance D MillerWake Forest School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA.
Dolores J SchendelMedigene Immunotherapies GmbH, Lochhamer Strasse 11, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Isabelle TanneauImmunID, 7 Parvis Louis Néel, BP50 Grenoble, France.
Jon M WiggintonMacroGenics, Inc., 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 USA.
Lisa H ButterfieldDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Immunology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cancer strikes, individuals vary not only in terms of factors that contribute to its occurrence and development, but as importantly, in their capacity to respond to treatment. While exciting new therapeutic options that mobilize the immune system against cancer have led to breakthroughs for a variety of malignancies, success is limited to a subset of patients. Pre-existing immunological features of both the host and the tumor may contribute to how patients will eventually fare with immunotherapy. A broad understanding of baseline immunity, both in the periphery and in the tumor microenvironment, is needed in order to fully realize the potential of cancer immunotherapy. Such interrogation of the tumor, blood, and host immune parameters prior to treatment is expected to identify biomarkers predictive of clinical outcome as well as to elucidate why some patients fail to respond to immunotherapy. To approach these opportunities for progress, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) reconvened the Immune Biomarkers Task Force. Comprised of an international multidisciplinary panel of experts, Working Group 4 sought to make recommendations that focus on the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, with its diversity of immune genes, proteins, cells, and pathways naturally present at baseline and in circulation, and novel tools to aid in such broad analyses.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorB-LymphocytesHumansImmunotherapyMutationMyeloid-Derived Suppressor CellsNeoplasmsPrognosisTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorBaseline immunityBiomarkersCancer immunotherapyImmune checkpoint inhibitorsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID28515944
PMCPMC5432988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.