Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515880›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Resistance and resilience of root fungal communities to water limitation in a temperate agroecosystem.

Jessie R Furze, Adam R Martin, Joshua Nasielski, Naresh V Thevathasan, Andrew M Gordon, Marney E Isaac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessie R FurzeDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences University of Toronto Scarborough Toronto Ontario Canada.
Adam R MartinDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences and the Centre for Critical Development Studies University of Toronto Scarborough Toronto Ontario Canada.
Joshua NasielskiDepartment of Geography University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Naresh V ThevathasanSchool of Environmental Sciences University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada.
Andrew M GordonSchool of Environmental Sciences University of Guelph Guelph Ontario Canada.
Marney E IsaacDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences and the Centre for Critical Development Studies University of Toronto Scarborough Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5975-833X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding crop resilience to environmental stress is critical in predicting the consequences of global climate change for agricultural systems worldwide, but to date studies addressing crop resiliency have focused primarily on plant physiological and molecular responses. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form mutualisms with many crop species, and these relationships are key in mitigating the effects of abiotic stress in many agricultural systems. However, to date there is little research examining whether (1) fungal community structure in agroecosystems is resistant to changing environmental conditions, specifically water limitation and (2) resilience of fungal community structure is moderated by agricultural management systems, namely the integration of trees into cropping systems. Here, we address these uncertainties through a rainfall reduction field experiment that manipulated short-term water availability in a soybean-based (

Indexed as

agroforestryarbuscular mycorrhizal fungiGlycine maxrainfall reductiontree‐based intercroppingT‐RFLPwater limitation

Identifiers

PMID28515880
PMCPMC5433968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.