Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515839›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science

Hypotensive Responses of Reciprocal Supersets versus Traditional Resistance Training in Apparently Healthy Men.

Claudio M Bentes, Pablo B Costa, Victor G Corrêa Neto, Roberto Simão, Gabriel A Paz, Marianna F Maia, Tiago Figueiredo, Gabriel R Neto, Jefferson S Novaes, Humberto Miranda

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Claudio M BentesFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Pablo B CostaDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, California, UNITED STATES.
Victor G Corrêa NetoFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Roberto SimãoFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Gabriel A PazFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Marianna F MaiaFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Tiago FigueiredoFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Gabriel R NetoDepartment of Physical Education, Associate Graduate Program in Physical Education UPE/UFPB, João Pessoa, Paraíba, BRAZIL.
Jefferson S NovaesFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Humberto MirandaFederal University of Rio de Janeiro. School of Physical Education and Sports. Rio de Janeiro - BRAZIL.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRCalifornia State University, Fullerton · USUniversidade Federal da Paraíba · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the hypotensive responses of reciprocal supersets (SS) versus traditional training (TRAD) methods. Thirteen men with at least five years of recreational experience in resistance training (RT) volunteered for the study. When completing the TRAD protocol, participants performed the following exercises separately in sequence: chest press (CP), low row (LR), leg extension (LE), leg curl (LC), pull down (PD), and shoulder press (SP). The SS method required participants to complete the same exercises as in the TRAD protocol, but exercises were coupled such that muscles sequentially served both as an agonist for lift one and then antagonist for lift two and vice versa. Exercise order used was CP and LR, LE and LC, and PD and SP with 10 repetition maximum loads. Blood pressure (BP) was measured before and for every 10 minutes for one hour after training. There was significantly more total work (TW) done in the TRAD condition compared to SS. Post exercise hypotension was evident only after the TRAD session at minutes 30 and 40 for systolic BP. Significant differences between the TRAD and SS methods were found at 20 minutes, 30 minutes, and 40 minutes for systolic BP. There was no significant two-way interaction for group × time for diastolic BP. There was a significant two-way interaction for group × time for mean arterial pressure. Significant reductions for mean arterial pressure (MAP) occurred only in the TRAD method after 30 to 40 minutes compared to the baseline values. Therefore, a TRAD RT method was sufficient to cause a hypotensive effect after the training session whereas the SS method did not reveal significant decreases in BP after the session. However, these findings are important to elucidate concerns regarding the post-exercise hypotension after RT and showed that TW might be the key to promote these changes because the volume of training was shown to be an important training variable to manipulate and might be associated with BP hypotension after RT.

Indexed as

blood pressurediastolic blood pressurehypotensionpost-exercise hypotensionStrength trainingsystolic blood pressure

Identifiers

PMID28515839
PMCPMC5421986
OpenAlexW2610647734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.