Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515713›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Energy Efficiency and Productivity Enhancement of Microbial Electrosynthesis of Acetate.

Edward V LaBelle, Harold D May

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role of microbial electrosynthesis system in COFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Electrochemical Characteristics ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbial electron uptake in microbial electrosynthesis: a mini-review.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. ContinuousBiotechnology for biofuels · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward V LaBelleHollings Marine Laboratory, Marine Biomedicine and Environmental Science Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, CharlestonSC, USA.
Harold D MayHollings Marine Laboratory, Marine Biomedicine and Environmental Science Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, CharlestonSC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It was hypothesized that a lack of acetogenic biomass (biocatalyst) at the cathode of a microbial electrosynthesis system, due to electron and nutrient limitations, has prevented further improvement in acetate productivity and efficiency. In order to increase the biomass at the cathode and thereby performance, a bioelectrochemical system with this acetogenic community was operated under galvanostatic control and continuous media flow through a reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) foam cathode. The combination of galvanostatic control and the high surface area cathode reduced the electron limitation and the continuous flow overcame the nutrient limitation while avoiding the accumulation of products and potential inhibitors. These conditions were set with the intention of operating the biocathode through the production of H

Indexed as

acetatebiocathodechemicals from CO2hydrogenindustrial biotechnologymicrobial electrosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID28515713
PMCPMC5413574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.