Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515286›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Responses of Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis of monkeys during smooth pursuit eye movements and saccades: comparison with floccular complex.

Ramanujan T Raghavan, Stephen G Lisberger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Strategies to Decipher Neuron Identity from Extracellular Recordings in Behaving Nonhuman Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Eye Movement Disorders and the Cerebellum.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2019
    Review
  10. Complex Spike Wars: a New Hope.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramanujan T RaghavanDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine Durham, North Carolina.
Stephen G LisbergerDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine Durham, North Carolina LISBERGER@neuro.duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-4361
Duke University · US

Funding

Neural Basis for Cerebellar Motor LearningR01NS092623 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LISBERGER, STEPHEN G · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recorded the responses of Purkinje cells in the oculomotor vermis during smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements. Our goal was to characterize the responses in the vermis using approaches that would allow direct comparisons with responses of Purkinje cells in another cerebellar area for pursuit, the floccular complex. Simple-spike firing of vermis Purkinje cells is direction selective during both pursuit and saccades, but the preferred directions are sufficiently independent so that downstream circuits could decode signals to drive pursuit and saccades separately. Complex spikes also were direction selective during pursuit, and almost all Purkinje cells showed a peak in the probability of complex spikes during the initiation of pursuit in at least one direction. Unlike the floccular complex, the preferred directions for simple spikes and complex spikes were not opposite. The kinematics of smooth eye movement described the simple-spike responses of vermis Purkinje cells well. Sensitivities were similar to those in the floccular complex for eye position and considerably lower for eye velocity and acceleration. The kinematic relations were quite different for saccades vs. pursuit, supporting the idea that the contributions from the vermis to each kind of movement could contribute independently in downstream areas. Finally, neither the complex-spike nor the simple-spike responses of vermis Purkinje cells were appropriate to support direction learning in pursuit. Complex spikes were not triggered reliably by an instructive change in target direction; simple-spike responses showed very small amounts of learning. We conclude that the vermis plays a different role in pursuit eye movements compared with the floccular complex.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCerebellar VermisEye Movement MeasurementsLearningMacaca mulattaMaleMicroelectrodesMotion PerceptionMotor ActivityNeuropsychological TestsPurkinje CellsPursuit, SmoothRegression AnalysisSaccadescerebellumcomplex spikeskinematic modelsmotor learningsimple spikes

Identifiers

PMID28515286
PMCPMC5539460
OpenAlexW2614938076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.