Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28515193›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the Danish 'TeleCare North' cluster-randomised trial.

Flemming Witt Udsen, Pernille Heyckendorff Lilholt, Ole Hejlesen, Lars Ehlers

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01984840 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Telemedicine for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Danish "TeleCare North" Pragmatic Cluster-randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2013 to 2015Enrolled1,225ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsTelemedicine
NCT05218525 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Can a Predictive Algorithm Used to Flag Risk of Exacerbations in a Telehealth System Strengthen the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Outcomes When Monitoring Patients With COPD?

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled138ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD Exacerbation, COPD Exacerbation Acute, COPDArmsAlgorithm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The Cost-Effectiveness of Mobile Health (mHealth) Interventions for Older Adults: Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Flemming Witt UdsenDanish Centre for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pernille Heyckendorff LilholtDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Ole HejlesenDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lars EhlersDanish Centre for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the cost-effectiveness of a telehealthcare solution in addition to usual care compared with usual care.

designA 12-month cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a cluster-randomised trial.

settingCommunity-based setting in the geographical area of North Denmark Region in Denmark.

participants26 municipality districts define randomisation clusters with 13 districts in each arm. 1225 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were enrolled, of which 578 patients were randomised to telehealthcare and 647 to usual care.

interventionsIn addition to usual care, patients in the intervention group received a set of telehealthcare equipment and were monitored by a municipality-based healthcare team. Patients in the control group received usual care.

main outcome measureIncremental costs per quality-adjusted life-years gained from baseline up to 12 months follow-up.

resultsFrom a healthcare and social sector perspective, the adjusted mean difference in total costs between telehealthcare and usual care was €728 (95% CI -754 to 2211) and the adjusted mean difference in quality-adjusted life-years gained was 0.0132 (95% CI -0.0083 to 0.0346). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €55 327 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Decision-makers should be willing to pay more than €55 000 to achieve a probability of cost-effectiveness >50%. This conclusion is robust to changes in the definition of hospital contacts and reduced intervention costs. Only in the most optimistic scenario combining the effects of all sensitivity analyses, does the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio fall below the UK thresholds values (€21 068 per quality-adjusted life-year).

conclusionsTelehealthcare is unlikely to be a cost-effective addition to usual care, if it is offered to all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and if the willingness-to-pay threshold values from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence are applied.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT01984840, 14 November 2013.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeRespiratory Function TestsTelemedicineCOPDCost-effectivenessDenmarkEconomic EvaluationRCTTelecareTelehealthTelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID28515193
PMCPMC5541337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.