ArticleJAMA surgery2017
Reoperation and Medicare Expenditures After Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating uncharted territory in surgical innovation: systematic review of non-standard metabolic bariatric surgery procedures.The British journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Management of Gastric Band Erosion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Obesity in the Workplace: Impact, Outcomes, and Recommendations.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2018Guideline
- Adjustable gastric band surgery or medical management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: three-year results of a randomized trial.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2019Trial
- From Approval to Evidence: Device Regulation, Long-Term Outcomes, and Conflicts of Interest in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2026Review
- Metabolic and bariatric surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: bibliometric analysis and visualisation from 1999 to 2023.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Using video-based assessment (VBA) to document fellow improvement in safely completing the jejunojejunostomy portion of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Review
- The durability of revisional sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after previous adjustable gastric band.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Outcomes from Explantation of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band: Experience from a Canadian Bariatric Center of Excellence.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Bariatric surgery outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.Obesity science & practice · 2021Article
- Efficacy and Mechanisms of Gastric Volume-Restriction Bariatric Devices.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Metabolic syndrome and liver disease in the era of bariatric surgery: What you need to know!World journal of hepatology · 2020Review
- Reoperation Incidence and Severity Within 6 Months After Bariatric Surgery: a Propensity-Matched Study from Nationwide Data.Obesity surgery · 2020Observational
- Association of revisions or conversions after sleeve gastrectomy with annual bariatric center procedural volume in the state of New York.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Bariatric Surgery Trends in the U.S.: 1% is the Loneliest Number.Annals of surgery · 2020Article
- Long-Term Inpatient Hospital Utilisation and Costs (2007-2008 to 2015-2016) for Publicly Waitlisted Bariatric Surgery Patients in an Australian Public Hospital System Based on Australia's Activity-Based Funding Model.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2019Article
- Spine centers of excellence: applications for the ambulatory care setting.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2019Review
- Meta-Analysis of Differential miRNA Expression after Bariatric Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Standardization of Bariatric Metabolic Procedures: World Consensus Meeting Statement.Obesity surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceFollowing the US Food and Drug Administration approval for laparoscopic gastric band surgery in 2001, as many as 96 000 devices have been placed annually. The reported rates of reoperation range from 4% to 60% in short-term studies; however, to our knowledge, few long-term population-level data on outcomes or expenditures are known.
objectiveTo describe the rate of device-related reoperations occurring after laparoscopic gastric band surgery as well as the associated payments in a longitudinal national cohort. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND
participantsThis retrospective review of 25 042 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent gastric band placement between 2006 and 2013 identifies gastric band-related reoperations, including device removal, device replacement, or revision to a different bariatric procedure (eg, a gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy). The rates of reoperation were risk adjusted using a multivariable logistic regression model that included patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, Elixhauser comorbidities, and the year that the operation was performed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rate of device-related reoperation nationally and across individual hospital referral regions. Thirty-day total episode Medicare payments to hospitals for the index operation and any subsequent reoperations.
resultsOf the 25 042 patients who underwent gastric band placement, 20 687 (82.61%) were white, 18 143 (72.45%) were women, and the mean age was 57.56 years. Patients (mean age, 57.5; 76.2% women) requiring reoperation had lower rates of hypertension (64.9% vs 73.4%; P < .001) and diabetes (40.4% vs 44.6%; P < .001) and were more likely to have their index operation at a for-profit hospital (34.6% vs 22.0%; P < .001). With an average of 4.5-year follow-up, 4636 patients (18.5%) underwent 17 539 reoperations (an average of 3.8 procedures/patient). Hospital referral regions demonstrated a 2.9-fold variation in risk- and reliability-adjusted rates of reoperation (lower quartile average, 13.3%; upper quartile average, 39.1%). During the study period, Medicare paid $470 million for laparoscopic gastric band associated procedures, of which $224 million (47.6%) of the payments were for reoperations. From 2006 to 2013, the proportion of payments from Medicare for reoperations increased from 16.4% to 77.3% of their annual spending on the gastric band device. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing gastric band surgery, device-related reoperation was common, costly, and varied widely across hospital referral regions. These findings suggest that payers should reconsider their coverage of the gastric band device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.