Trial reportJAMA dermatology2017
Effect of Expedited Microneedle-Assisted Photodynamic Therapy for Field Treatment of Actinic Keratoses: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02594644 (The Use of Microneedles to Expedite Treatment Time in Photodynamic Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of Microneedles to Expedite Treatment Time in Photodynamic Therapy
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2021Pooled it
- Canadian Expert Consensus Recommendations on the Use of Photodynamic Therapy in Actinic Keratosis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- International expert consensus on transdermal drug delivery technologies in dermatology.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Composing drug delivery with light distribution improvement: the use of dissolving microneedles in skin cancer with photodynamic therapy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Microneedles meet photomedicine: emerging strategies for diagnosis and therapy of skin diseases.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Microneedles in Allergy Immunotherapy: the Present and Future.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Microneedling for Non-cosmetic Dermatologic Conditions: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.Cureus · 2025Review
- Red-Light Photodynamic Therapy with 10% Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA) Following Microneedling in the Treatment of Facial Actinic Keratosis: Cosmetic and Clinical Outcomes.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Article
- A piezoelectric-driven microneedle platform for skin disease therapy.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Article
- Designing a Placebo Microneedle Stamp: Modeling and Validation in a Clinical Control Trial.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Accelerating patient recruitment using social media: Early adopter experience from a good clinical practice-monitored randomized controlled phase I/IIa clinical trial on actinic keratosis.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- The use of photodynamic therapy in medical practice.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Advancements in skin cancer treatment: focus on photodynamic therapy: a review.American journal of cancer research · 2024Review
- Photodynamic Therapy for Field Cancerization in the Skin: Where Do We Stand?Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2023Review
- Advances in Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2023Review
- Global Trends and Research Progress of Photodynamic Therapy in Skin Cancer: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023Review
- Sandpaper curettage: A simple method to improve PDT outcomes for actinic keratosis.Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2022Article
- Combination-Based Strategies for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses with Photodynamic Therapy: An Evidence-Based Review.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Microneedles in Action: Microneedling and Microneedles-Assisted Transdermal Delivery.Polymers · 2022Review
- Advances in Photodynamic Therapy Based on Nanotechnology and Its Application in Skin Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective and cosmetically favorable treatment modality for actinic keratoses (AKs). However, prolonged incubation times and pain associated with treatment are burdensome to the patient and a hindrance to widespread use of PDT as standard field therapy for AK. Objective: To evaluate efficacy and pain associated with microneedle expedited PDT. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Microneedle Photodynamic Therapy II (MNPDT-II) study was a randomized, single-blinded, split-face controlled, 2-arm clinical trial. Thirty-three participants with AK on the face were recruited in a university dermatology outpatient clinic from 2015 to 2016, and 32 participants completed the study. Interventions: Participants were randomized into 2 incubations arms, either 10-minute or 20-minute aminolevulinic acid (ALA) incubation times, after pretreatment with a microneedle roller (200 um) vs a sham roller. They were blinded to the laterality of microneedle and sham roller assignments. After incubation, they were exposed to blue light (Blu-U, Dusa Pharmaceuticals) for 1000 seconds for a total fluence of 10 J/cm2. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was to quantitatively measure AK resolution, and the secondary outcome was to assess pain associated with microneedle pretreatment. Results: Thirty-three individuals were recruited and randomized to either the 20-minute or the 10-minute incubation arm. Thirty-two participants completed the study with a mean follow-up time of 34.5 days in the 20-minute group, and 30.2 days in the 10-minute group. For the 20-minute incubation arm, average AK clearance was 76% vs 58% on the sham side (P < .01), including 3 patients with complete clearance, although not statistically significant (P = .25). Pain assessment on the visual analog scale (VAS) during blue light illumination was not significantly different between the microneedle and sham sides (0.7 and 0.4; P = .28), respectively. For the 10-minute incubation arm AK clearance for the microneedle pretreated side was 43% compared with 38% on the sham side (P = .66). Pain during the blue light exposure was not significantly different between the microneedle and sham sides, 4.5 mm and 3.4 mm (P = .21), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Photodynamic therapy with microneedle pretreatment at a 20-minute ALA incubation time significantly improved AK clearance with efficacy similar to that of a conventional 1-hour ALA incubation time. The additional advantage to expedited treatment was that the procedure was virtually painless. However, expedited exposure of a 10-minute ALA incubation time did not reach significantly different AK clearance from the sham control. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02594644.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.