Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28514427›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2017

Illuminating developmental biology through photochemistry.

Lukasz Kowalik, James K Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sensing a rainbow of colors: algal photoreceptors.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Visible and NIR light photoactivatableRSC medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lukasz KowalikDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
James K ChenDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9220-8436

Funding

TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FERRELL, JAMES E. · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
Development of lariat-shaped caged morpholinos for optochemical gene regulationR01GM108952 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, JAMES K · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental biology has been continually shaped by technological advances, evolving from a descriptive science into one immersed in molecular and cellular mechanisms. Most recently, genome sequencing and 'omics' profiling have provided developmental biologists with a wealth of genetic and biochemical information; however, fully translating this knowledge into functional understanding will require new experimental capabilities. Photoactivatable probes have emerged as particularly valuable tools for investigating developmental mechanisms, as they can enable rapid, specific manipulations of DNA, RNA, proteins, and cells with spatiotemporal precision. In this Perspective, we describe optochemical and optogenetic systems that have been applied in multicellular organisms, insights gained through the use of these probes, and their current limitations. We also suggest how chemical biologists can expand the reach of photoactivatable technologies and bring new depth to our understanding of organismal development.

Indexed as

PhotochemistryDevelopmental BiologyGenomicsModels, BiologicalMolecular ProbesMolecular StructureRhodopsinMolecular ProbesRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID28514427
PMCPMC5511696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.