ReviewMedicine2017
Trends in esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer research from 2007 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis.
Review in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Knowledge map of transcranial magnetic stimulation for insomnia: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Global research trends of home pharmaceutical care: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A bibliometric analysis of acupuncture for cerebral infarction from 1993 to 2023.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Publication trend, resource utilization, and impact of the US National Cancer Database: A systematic review.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Mapping knowledge domain of acupuncture for Parkinson's disease: a bibliometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Global trends in oncology research: A mixed-methods study of publications and clinical trials from 2010 to 2019.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Mapping Research Trends from 20 Years of Publications in Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Bibliometric Study of Exercise and Tendinopathy Research from 2001 to 2020.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
- The published trend of studies on COVID-19 and dietary supplements: Bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Emerging Trends and Research Foci in Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Research trends and hotspots of breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Global research trend of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from 2012 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Research trends on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for esophageal cancer: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Knowledge framework and emerging trends in intracranial aneurysm magnetic resonance angiography: a scientometric analysis from 2004 to 2020.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Scientific Knowledge Graph of Acupuncture for Migraine: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2019.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- The most-cited articles in geriatric oncology: a bibliometric analysis.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2021Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Research on the Comorbidity of Pain and Inflammation.Pain research & management · 2021Review
- Knowledge Mapping of Acupuncture for Cancer Pain: A Scientometric Analysis (2000-2019).Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- The Most-Cited Authors Who Published Papers in JMIR mHealth and uHealth Using the Authorship-Weighted Scheme: Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to analyze the scientific outputs of esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer and construct a model to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate pertinent publications from the past decade.
methodsPublications from 2007 to 2016 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Microsoft Excel 2016 (Redmond, WA) and the CiteSpace (Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA) software were used to analyze publication outcomes, journals, countries, institutions, authors, research areas, and research frontiers.
resultsA total of 12,978 publications on esophageal and EGJ cancer were identified published until March 23, 2017. The Journal of Clinical Oncology had the largest number of publications, the USA was the leading country, and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was the leading institution. Ajani JA published the most papers, and Jemal A had the highest co-citation counts. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma ranked the first in research hotspots, and preoperative chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy ranked the first in research frontiers.
conclusionThe annual number of publications steadily increased in the past decade. A considerable number of papers were published in journals with high impact factor. Many Chinese institutions engaged in esophageal and EGJ cancer research but significant collaborations among them were not noted. Jemal A, Van Hagen P, Cunningham D, and Enzinger PC were identified as good candidates for research collaboration. Neoadjuvant therapy and genome-wide association study in esophageal and EGJ cancer research should be closely observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.