SynthesisMedicine2017
Continuous venovenous hemofiltration in the management of paraquat poisoning: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracorporeal therapies in the management of paraquat poisoning: a comprehensive review of current evidence.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy of the atropine and pralidoxime treatment combined with hemoperfusion in patients with acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Epidemiological patterns and therapeutic approaches of toad toxin poisoning in a retrospective case study.Scientific reports · 2025Review
- A hospital management algorithm for acute poisoning by Paraquat® in a pediatric population, a series of casesBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2024Article
- The efficacy of hemodialysis on paraquat poisoning mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022Review
- Does hemoperfusion in combination with other treatments reduce the mortality of patients with paraquat poisoning more than hemoperfusion alone: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParaquat (PQ) poisoning is a widespread occurrence, especially in underdeveloped areas. The treatment of PQ poisoning has always been difficult, and there is currently no definite effective treatment. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) treatment for PQ poisoning has been widely used in clinical practice; however, its effect remains uncertain. Accordingly, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of CVVH in the treatment of PQ poisoning.
methodsWe searched for relevant trials using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and 3 Chinese databases, the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, and Wanfang Database. We included all qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CVVH treatment for patients with PQ poisoning. The primary outcome was mortality, while the secondary outcomes included the survival time and constituent ratios of death due to respiratory failure and circulatory failure.
resultsThree RCTs involving 290 patients were included. The mortality rates of the intervention and control groups were 57.9% and 61.0%, respectively. Pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mortality between the CVVH treatment and control groups (risk ratio [RR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.15, P = .56), with a low level of heterogeneity (X = 1.75, I = 0%). However, the CVVH group was associated with a longer survival time compared to the control group (weighted mean difference 1.73, 95% CI: 0.56-2.90, P = .004). Respiratory failure as the cause of death was more common in the CVVH group, as compared with the control group (RR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.24-2.23, P = .0008), whereas patients in the control group were more likely to die from circulatory failure than in the CVVH group (RR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.40-0.81, P = .002).
conclusionAlthough CVVH treatment might not noticeably reduce mortality for patients with PQ poisoning, it can prolong the survival time of the patients and improve the stability of the circulatory system, thereby enabling further treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.