Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28513912›Full record

ReviewJournal of surgical oncology2017

Improving theranostics in pancreatic cancer.

Jeremy King, Michael Bouvet, Gagandeep Singh, John Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ImmunoPET/NIRF/Cerenkov multimodality imaging of ICAM-1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular pharmaceutics · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy KingDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Beckman Research Institute at City of Hope, Duarte, California.
Michael BouvetDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0086-2159
Gagandeep SinghDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
John WilliamsDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Beckman Research Institute at City of Hope, Duarte, California.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-384X
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

In situ Imaging of CAR T-cellsR21CA193055 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI BROWN, CHRISTINE, WILLIAMS, JOHN CHARLES · 2015 to 2017
$740k
Optimization of multivalent ligands by super-resolution microscopy to treat canceR21CA174608 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI TALISMAN, TIJANA, WILLIAMS, JOHN CHARLES · 2013 to 2015
$650k
Monoclonal Antibody-based Prodrugs - Novel Tools for Cancer TherapyR21CA135216 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RODECK, ULRICH, WILLIAMS, JOHN CHARLES · 2010 to 2011
$392k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA135216NCI NIH HHS R21 CA174608NCI NIH HHS R21 CA193055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer is the fourth most deadly cancer in the United States, and is expected to be the second most deadly by 2030. The major difficulty in treating pancreatic cancer is the late onset of symptoms. Generally, patients show metastatic disease by the time of diagnosis, with a survival rate of 5% beyond 5 years. In patients without metastatic disease, surgical resection increases 5 year survival rate to 25%. The remaining 75% succumb to undetected metastases. Clearly, improvements to both detection, surgical intervention, and therapeutic strategies will be needed to improve patient outcome in pancreatic cancer.

methodsRecent literature has been surveyed and atomic models of new therapeutic approaches were generated. RESULTS AND

conclusionsHere, we focus on the recent progress employing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to target pancreatic cancer associated markers, and more specifically on recent chemical and protein engineering efforts to improve the homogeneity, stability, and administration of mAbs to precisely deliver imaging agents and cytotoxins to sites of disease.

Indexed as

Theranostic NanomedicineAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenGlycoproteinsGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansMesothelinMucin-1Pancreatic NeoplasmsProtein EngineeringAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, NeoplasmCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenGlycoproteinsGPI-Linked ProteinsMesothelinMucin-1tumor-associated antigen 72antibody engineeringsite directed conjugationtheranostics

Identifiers

PMID28513912
PMCPMC5520663
OpenAlexW2615446275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.