Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28513579›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Electricity from methane by reversing methanogenesis.

Michael J McAnulty, Venkata G Poosarla, Kyoung-Yeol Kim, Ricardo Jasso-Chávez, Bruce E Logan, Thomas K Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Teaching old dogs new tricks: genetic engineering methanogens.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Biohythane: a Potential Biofuel of the Future.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Electrochemically coupled CHNature communications · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Insights into the biotechnology potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael J McAnultyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-4400, USA.
Venkata G PoosarlaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-4400, USA.
Kyoung-Yeol KimDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-4400, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2655-7806
Ricardo Jasso-ChávezDepartment of Biochemistry, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Bruce E LoganDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-4400, USA.
Thomas K WoodDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-4400, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6258-529X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given our vast methane reserves and the difficulty in transporting methane without substantial leaks, the conversion of methane directly into electricity would be beneficial. Microbial fuel cells harness electrical power from a wide variety of substrates through biological means; however, the greenhouse gas methane has not been used with much success previously as a substrate in microbial fuel cells to generate electrical current. Here we construct a synthetic consortium consisting of: (i) an engineered archaeal strain to produce methyl-coenzyme M reductase from unculturable anaerobic methanotrophs for capturing methane and secreting acetate; (ii) micro-organisms from methane-acclimated sludge (including Paracoccus denitrificans) to facilitate electron transfer by providing electron shuttles (confirmed by replacing the sludge with humic acids), and (iii) Geobacter sulfurreducens to produce electrons from acetate, to create a microbial fuel cell that converts methane directly into significant electrical current. Notably, this methane microbial fuel cell operates at high Coulombic efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID28513579
PMCPMC5442358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.