Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2851351›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1988

Selective modulation by membrane potential of the interaction of some calcium entry blockers with calcium channels in rat mesenteric artery.

N Morel, T Godfraind

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antioxidant effects and the therapeutic mode of action of calcium channel blockers in hypertension and atherosclerosis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2005
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cardioselectivity of calcium antagonists.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 1994
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N MorelLaboratoire de Pharmacodynamie Générale, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium.
T Godfraind
UCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The effects of flunarizine, (+)-PN 200-110 and nifedipine on [3H]-(+)-PN 200-110 specific binding were investigated in intact rat mesenteric arteries bathed in physiological solution or in KCl-depolarizing solution, and in a membrane fraction from rat mesenteric arteries. 2. Unlabelled dihydropyridines, (+)-PN 200-110 and nifedipine, inhibited [3H]-(+)-PN 200-110 specific binding concentration-dependently in polarized as well as in depolarized intact arteries. The Ki value of (+)-PN 200-110 was decreased in arteries bathed in KCl-depolarizing solution compared to arteries bathed in physiological solution, while the Ki value of nifedipine was not significantly changed. Ki values measured in depolarized arteries were close to the IC50 values (concentrations inhibiting by 50% the KCl-contraction of rat mesenteric artery). 3. Flunarizine (10(-6) M) was unable to displace the specific binding of [3H]-(+)-PN 200-110 in intact arteries bathed in physiological solution. At 10(-7) M-10(-6) M, it inhibited the binding in depolarized arteries, suggesting that prolonged depolarization is required for the interaction of flunarizine with the dihydropyridine receptor. 4. In a membrane fraction isolated from rat mesenteric arteries, (+)-PN 200-110, nifedipine and flunarizine were all able to displace completely the specific binding of [3H]-(+)-PN 200-110. Displacement curves were parallel and Hill coefficients were close to unity. Ki values were close to the values obtained in depolarized intact arteries. 5. These results revealed a good correlation between the data obtained from binding tests and from pharmacological studies for dihydropyridine calcium entry blocking drugs, taking into account the time-dependence associated with their action on KCl-contraction compared to their binding properties. There was an important discrepancy between the concentrations of flunarizine active in binding studies and those active in pharmacological studies, which could be accounted for by the existence of multiple binding sites for calcium entry blockers in calcium channels.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsFlunarizineIn Vitro TechniquesIsradipineMembrane PotentialsMembranesMesenteric ArteriesMuscle, Smooth, VascularNifedipineOxadiazolesRatsRats, Inbred StrainsCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsFlunarizineIsradipineNifedipineOxadiazoles

Identifiers

PMID2851351
PMCPMC1854141
OpenAlexW2046371913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.