Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28513488›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2017

Imaging in tuberculosis-associated uveitis.

Reema Bansal, Soumyava Basu, Amod Gupta, Narsing Rao, Alessandro Invernizzi, Michal Kramer

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Primary tubercular chorioretinitis: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ocular tuberculosis: Where are we today?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Infectious uveitis: an Asian perspective.Eye (London, England) · 2019
    Review
  9. Multimodal imaging of choroidal tubercles.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018
    Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Reema BansalAdvanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Soumyava BasuAdvanced Eye Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Amod GuptaAdvanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Narsing RaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, USC School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alessandro InvernizziDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Science Luigi Sacco, Eye Clinic, Luigi Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Michal KramerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
University of Milan · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraocular tuberculosis (TB) can have several clinical presentations, affecting nearly every tissue of the eye. These clinical signs have specific imaging characteristics which help in associating them with tuberculous etiology. This review enumerates the conventional and emerging imaging techniques for intraocular TB and highlights their clinical application for diagnosis and management of specific clinical presentations.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialEye Infections, BacterialFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansMultimodal ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceTuberculosis, OcularUveitis

Identifiers

PMID28513488
PMCPMC5452576
OpenAlexW2615730841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.