Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28513431›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Dissection of zebrafish

Kotaro Sugimoto, Subhra P Hui, Delicia Z Sheng, Kazu Kikuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GlialeLife · 2026
    Article
  6. Advancing Knock-In Approaches for Robust Genome Editing in Zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Control of cardiac contractions using Cre-lox and degron strategies in zebrafish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cre/eLife · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. From Stripes to a Beating Heart: Early Cardiac Development in Zebrafish.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kotaro SugimotoDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Subhra P HuiDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Delicia Z ShengDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia.
Kazu KikuchiDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology Division, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4681-4275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the extensive use of zebrafish as a model organism in developmental biology and regeneration research, genetic techniques enabling conditional analysis of gene function are limited. In this study, we generated

Indexed as

Gene TargetingAnimalsHeartHedgehog ProteinsMorphogenesisRecombination, GeneticZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsShha protein, zebrafishZebrafish Proteinscardiomyocytedevelopmental biologyepicardiumheart developmentheart regenerationknockout animalsstem cellszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28513431
PMCPMC5435461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.