Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28513246›Full record

ArticleUpsala journal of medical sciences2017

Molecular composition and distribution of gap junctions in the sensory epithelium of the human cochlea-a super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM) study.

Wei Liu, Hao Li, Fredrik Edin, Johan Brännström, Rudolf Glueckert, Annelies Schrott-Fischer, Matyas Molnar, Dirk Pacholsky, Kristian Pfaller, Helge Rask-Andersen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Connexin Mutations and Hereditary Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei Liua Department of Surgical Sciences, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology , Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden.
Hao Lia Department of Surgical Sciences, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology , Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden.
Fredrik Edina Department of Surgical Sciences, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology , Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden.
Johan Brännströmb Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, The Rudbeck Laboratory , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Rudolf Glueckertc Department of Otolaryngology , Medical University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck , Austria.
Annelies Schrott-Fischerc Department of Otolaryngology , Medical University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck , Austria.
Matyas Molnard Science for Life Laboratory , BioVis Facility, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Dirk Pacholskyd Science for Life Laboratory , BioVis Facility, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Kristian Pfallere Department of Histology and Molecular Cell Biology , Institute of Anatomy and Histology, Medical University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck , Austria.
Helge Rask-Andersena Department of Surgical Sciences, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Department of Otolaryngology , Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden.
Uppsala University Hospital · SEInnsbruck Medical University · ATUppsala University · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SEUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutations in the GJB2 gene, which encodes the Connexin26 (Cx26) protein, are the most common cause of childhood hearing loss in American and European populations. The cochlea contains a gap junction (GJ) network in the sensory epithelium and two connective tissue networks in the lateral wall and spiral limbus. The syncytia contain the GJ proteins beta 2 (GJB2/Cx26) and beta 6 (GJB6/Cx30). Our knowledge of their expression in humans is insufficient due to the limited availability of tissue. Here, we sought to establish the molecular arrangement of GJs in the epithelial network of the human cochlea using surgically obtained samples.

methodsWe analyzed Cx26 and Cx30 expression in GJ networks in well-preserved adult human auditory sensory epithelium using confocal, electron, and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SR-SIM).

resultsCx30 plaques (<5 μm) dominated, while Cx26 plaques were subtle and appeared as 'mini-junctions' (2-300 nm). 3-D volume rendering of Z-stacks and orthogonal projections from single optical sections suggested that the GJs are homomeric/homotypic and consist of assemblies of identical GJs composed of either Cx26 or Cx30. Occasionally, the two protein types were co-expressed, suggesting functional cooperation.

conclusionsEstablishing the molecular composition and distribution of the GJ networks in the human cochlea may increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of Cx-related hearing loss. This information may also assist in developing future strategies to treat genetic hearing loss.

Indexed as

AdultCochleaConnexinsEpitheliumFemaleGap JunctionsHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMiddle AgedConnexinsCochleaconfocal microscopyconnexin 26/30humanSR-SIM

Identifiers

PMID28513246
PMCPMC5649321
OpenAlexW2616207023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.