Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512722›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017

Status of cardiovascular PET radiation exposure and strategies for reduction: An Information Statement from the Cardiovascular PET Task Force.

James A Case, Robert A deKemp, Piotr J Slomka, Mark F Smith, Gary V Heller, Manuel D Cerqueira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Feasibility of exercise treadmillJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. The indications and utility of adjunctive imaging modalities for chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Effects of two patient-specific dosing protocols on measurement of myocardial blood flow with 3DEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  9. Cardiac PET imaging: Lost in quantification. It's time to find the way.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Body weight-dependent Rubidium-82 activity results in constant image quality in myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Internal validation of myocardial flow reserve PET imaging using stress/rest myocardial activity ratios with Rb-82 and N-13-ammonia.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. EANM procedural guidelines for PET/CT quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Drivers of radiation dose reduction with myocardial perfusion imaging: A large health system experience.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  19. SPECT but not PET remains as the working horse of the state of the art nuclear cardiac imaging laboratory: Con.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James A CaseCardiovascular Imaging Technologies, L.L.C, Kansas City, MO, USA. jcase@cvit.com.
Robert A deKempUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Piotr J SlomkaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mark F SmithUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gary V HellerGagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Manuel D CerqueiraCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular positron emission tomography (PET) imaging provides high-quality visual and quantitative myocardial perfusion and function images. In addition, cardiovascular PET can assess myocardial viability, myocardial inflammatory disorders such as cardiac sarcoid, and infections of implanted devices including pacemakers, ventricular assist devices, and prosthetic heart valves. As with all nuclear cardiology procedures, the benefits need to be considered in relation to the risks of exposure to radiation. When performed properly, these assessments can be obtained while simultaneously minimizing radiation exposure. The purpose of this information statement is to present current concepts to minimize patient and staff radiation exposure while ensuring high image quality.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPatient PositioningPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRubidium RadioisotopesRubidium Radioisotopesmyocardial perfusion imaging: PETPET imagingradiation protection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.