Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512580›Full record

ReviewJournal of ophthalmology2017

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Circular Cyclocoagulation in Glaucoma: A Step Forward for Cyclodestruction?

Rodolfo Mastropasqua, Vincenzo Fasanella, Alessandra Mastropasqua, Marco Ciancaglini, Luca Agnifili

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04430647 (Phaco-UCP; Combined Phacoemulsification and Ultrasound Ciliary Plasty Versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Management of Coexisting Cataract and Open Angle Glaucoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04430647 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Phaco-UCP; Combined Phacoemulsification and Ultrasound Ciliary Plasty Versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Management of Coexisting Cataract and Open Angle Glaucoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmeera Gamal AbdelhameedRan2018 to 2020Enrolled61ConditionsCataract, Glaucoma, Open-AngleArmscombined phacoemulsification and ultrasound ciliary plasty (Phaco-UCP), Phacoemulsification alone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ultrasonic cycloplastyInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodolfo MastropasquaMoorfields Eye Hospital, London EC1V 2PD, UK.
Vincenzo FasanellaOphthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Ageing Science, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-052X
Alessandra MastropasquaOphthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Ageing Science, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Marco CiancagliniOphthalmology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Luca AgnifiliOphthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Ageing Science, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1625-6305
University of Chieti-Pescara · ITMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ciliary body ablation is still considered as a last resort treatment to reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP) in uncontrolled glaucoma. Several ablation techniques have been proposed over the years, all presenting a high rate of complications, nonselectivity for the target organ, and unpredictable dose-effect relationship. These drawbacks limited the application of cyclodestructive procedures almost exclusively to refractory glaucoma. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), proposed in the early 1980s and later abandoned because of the complexity and side effects of the procedure, was recently reconsidered in a new approach to destroy the ciliary body. Ultrasound circular cyclocoagulation (UC

Identifiers

PMID28512580
PMCPMC5420440
OpenAlexW2607160985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.