Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512488›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2017

Fatemeh Ramezanali, Sasan Aryanezhad, Fatemeh Mohammadian, Fatemeh Dibaji, Mohammad Javad Kharazifard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Layered external repair with microsurgery of maxillary central incisor with external cervical resorption].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sealing Ability of Nano-fast CementIranian endodontic journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fatemeh RamezanaliDepartment of Endodontics, Dental School, International Campus of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sasan AryanezhadGeneral Dentist, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh MohammadianDepartment of Endodontics, Dental School, International Campus of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh DibajiDepartment of Endodontics, Dental School, International Campus of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Javad KharazifardStatistical Advisor, Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study was conducted on 76 extracted single-canal human teeth. Their root canals were prepared using ProTaper rotary files and filled with gutta percha and AH-26 sealer using lateral condensation technique. Coronal 3 mm of the gutta percha was removed from the root canals and replaced randomly with MTA, CEM cement or Biodentine in the three experimental groups (

resultsThe negative control group showed no leakage while the positive control group showed significantly higher microleakage than the test groups (

conclusionCEM cement exhibited the least microleakage as an intra-orifice barrier in endodontically treated teeth.

Indexed as

BiodentineCalcium-Enriched MixtureIntra-Orifice BarrierMicroleakageMineral Trioxide Aggregate

Identifiers

PMID28512488
PMCPMC5431712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.