Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512485›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2017

Effect of Blood Exposure on Push-Out Bond Strength of Four Calcium Silicate Based Cements.

Kazem Ashofteh Yazdi, Behnam Bolhari, Tohid Sabetmoghaddam, Naghmeh Meraji, Mohammad Javad Kharazifard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Effect ofIranian endodontic journal · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kazem Ashofteh YazdiDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behnam BolhariDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tohid SabetmoghaddamPrivate Practice, Tehran, Iran.
Naghmeh MerajiDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Javad KharazifardDental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength of white ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement and Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM) putty after exposure to blood. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 96 root dentin slices with a standardized thickness of 1.00±0.05 mm and standardized canal spaces were randomly divided into 4 main experimental groups (

resultsBiodentine exhibited the highest values regardless of the exposure time. The lowest push-out strength values were seen in white ProRoot MTA and CEM cement in both post exposure times. After exposure to blood, the push-out bond strength of all materials increased over time. This increase was only statistically significant in white ProRoot MTA and ERRM specimens. The dominant failure mode in all CSCs was the adhesive mode.

conclusionBiodentine showed the highest values of push-out bond strength and may be better options for situations encountering higher dislocation forces in a short time after cement application.

Indexed as

BiodentineBloodCalcium-Enriched Mixture CementEndosequence Root Repair MaterialMineral Trioxide Aggregate

Identifiers

PMID28512485
PMCPMC5431728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.