ArticleIranian endodontic journal2017
Physical Properties and Chemical Characterization of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin Root Canal Sealers.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antimicrobial additives in resin-based endodontic sealers: a scoping review of antimicrobial efficacy, physicochemical properties, and cytotoxicity.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of an Experimental Resin-based Sealer (Resil) and AH-26 on Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Iranian endodontic journal · 2024Trial
- Physical, chemical and biological properties of MTA Angelus and novel AGM MTA: an in vitro analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Characterisation of the Bioactivity and the Solubility of a New Root Canal Sealer.International dental journal · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Physical Properties of Three Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers: An In-Vitro Study.Frontiers in dentistry · 2023Article
- Biocompatibility of an experimental endodontic sealer (Resil) in comparison with AH26 and AH-Plus in rats: An animal study.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Chemical and Physical Properties of an Experimental Endodontic Sealer in Comparison with AH-26 and AH-Plus.Iranian endodontic journal · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Selective Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Different Root Canal Sealers.Iranian endodontic journal · 2019Article
- Endodontic Sealers Modified with Silver Vanadate: Antibacterial, Compositional, and Setting Time Evaluation.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Influence of Adding Nanoparticles of Silver Vanadate on Antibacterial Effect and Physicochemical Properties of Endodontic Sealers.Iranian endodontic journal · 2019Article
- Cytotoxicity of Two Experimental Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers.Iranian endodontic journal · 2018Article
- Physical Properties, Cytocompatibility and Sealability of HealApex (a Novel Premixed Biosealer).Iranian endodontic journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five samples of each material were evaluated for setting time, flow, film thickness, solubility and radiopacity according to ISO 6876 Standard. Characterization of sealers was performed under the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
resultsIn this study, AH-26 showed more radiopacity and flow compared to two other experimental sealers (
conclusionAccording to the result of this study, all tested root canal sealers had acceptable properties based on ISO 6876 standard criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.