Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512461›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Transcriptional Responses to Pre-flowering Leaf Defoliation in Grapevine Berry from Different Growing Sites, Years, and Genotypes.

Sara Zenoni, Silvia Dal Santo, Giovanni B Tornielli, Erica D'Incà, Ilaria Filippetti, Chiara Pastore, Gianluca Allegro, Oriana Silvestroni, Vania Lanari, Antonino Pisciotta and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sunburn in Grapes: A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sara ZenoniDepartment of Biotechnology, University of VeronaVerona, Italy.
Silvia Dal SantoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of VeronaVerona, Italy.
Giovanni B TornielliDepartment of Biotechnology, University of VeronaVerona, Italy.
Erica D'IncàDepartment of Biotechnology, University of VeronaVerona, Italy.
Ilaria FilippettiDepartment of Agricultural Science, University of BolognaBologna, Italy.
Chiara PastoreDepartment of Agricultural Science, University of BolognaBologna, Italy.
Gianluca AllegroDepartment of Agricultural Science, University of BolognaBologna, Italy.
Oriana SilvestroniDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Vania LanariDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Antonino PisciottaDepartment of Agricultural and Forest sciences, University of PalermoPalermo, Italy.
Rosario Di LorenzoDepartment of Agricultural and Forest sciences, University of PalermoPalermo, Italy.
Alberto PalliottiDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università di PerugiaPerugia, Italy.
Sergio TombesiDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università di PerugiaPerugia, Italy.
Matteo GattiDipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Vegetali Sostenibili, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuorePiacenza, Italy.
Stefano PoniDipartimento di Scienze delle Produzioni Vegetali Sostenibili, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuorePiacenza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf removal is a grapevine canopy management technique widely used to modify the source-sink balance and/or microclimate around berry clusters to optimize fruit composition. In general, the removal of basal leaves before flowering reduces fruit set, hence achieving looser clusters, and improves grape composition since yield is generally curtailed more than proportionally to leaf area itself. Albeit responses to this practice seem quite consistent, overall vine performance is affected by genotype, environmental conditions, and severity of treatment. The physiological responses of grape varieties to defoliation practices have been widely investigated, and just recently a whole genome transcriptomic approach was exploited showing an extensive transcriptome rearrangement in berries defoliated before flowering. Nevertheless, the extent to which these transcriptomic reactions could be manifested by different genotypes and growing environments is entirely unexplored. To highlight general responses to defoliation vs. different locations, we analyzed the transcriptome of cv. Sangiovese berries sampled at four development stages from pre-flowering defoliated vines in two different geographical areas of Italy. We obtained and validated five markers of the early defoliation treatment in Sangiovese, an ATP-binding cassette transporter, an auxin response factor, a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, a flavonoid 3-

Indexed as

berry transcriptomeflavonoidgrapevinepre-flowering defoliationsecondary metabolite

Identifiers

PMID28512461
PMCPMC5411443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.