Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512377›Full record

ArticleJournal of nematology2017

Species Delimitation and Description of

Magdalena Olson, Timothy Harris, Rebecca Higgins, Peter Mullin, Kirsten Powers, Sean Olson, Thomas O Powers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Description of a New Cryptic Rhabditid,Journal of nematology · 2025
    Article
  5. Case Report: High burdens of air sac worms (Frontiers in parasitology · 2025
    Article
  6. Otterly diverse - A high diversity ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Blind-Identification Test onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Morphostatic Speciation within the Dagger NematodePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. A new stunt nematode,Journal of nematology · 2020
    Article
  15. A new rare nematodeJournal of nematology · 2020
    Article
  16. Description and molecular phylogeny ofJournal of nematology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. First Report ofJournal of nematology · 2019
    Article
  19. Updated description ofJournal of nematology · 2019
    Article
  20. Description ofJournal of nematology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Magdalena OlsonDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722.
Timothy HarrisDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722.
Rebecca HigginsDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722.
Peter MullinDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722.
Kirsten PowersDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722.
Sean OlsonDepartment of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0963.
Thomas O PowersDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nematode surveys of North American grasslands conducted from 2010 to 2015 frequently recovered a species of criconematid nematode morphologically resembling

Indexed as

biogeographycryptic speciesnematode distributionnetwork analysisphylogenyplant-parasitic nematodestallgrass prairiestaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID28512377
PMCPMC5411254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.