Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512323›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Nicotine in floral nectar pharmacologically influences bumblebee learning of floral features.

D Baracchi, A Marples, A J Jenkins, A R Leitch, L Chittka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Learning modifies attention during bumblebee visual search.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Sweet solutions: nectar chemistry and quality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D BaracchiQueen Mary University of London, Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. david.baracchi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-0612
A MarplesUniversity College London, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Faculty of Life Sciences, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
A J JenkinsQueen Mary University of London, Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
A R LeitchQueen Mary University of London, Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
L ChittkaQueen Mary University of London, Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-1732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many plants defend themselves against herbivores by chemical deterrents in their tissues and the presence of such substances in floral nectar means that pollinators often encounter them when foraging. The effect of such substances on the foraging behaviour of pollinators is poorly understood. Using artificial flowers in tightly-controlled laboratory settings, we examined the effects of the alkaloid nicotine on bumblebee foraging performance. We found that bumblebees confronted simultaneously with two equally rewarded nicotine-containing and nicotine-free flower types are deterred only by unnaturally high nicotine concentrations. This deterrence disappears or even turns into attraction at lower nectar-relevant concentrations. The alkaloid has profound effects on learning in a dose-dependent manner. At a high natural dose, bees learn the colour of a nicotine-containing flower type more swiftly than a flower type with the same caloric value but without nicotine. Furthermore, after experiencing flowers containing nicotine in any tested concentration, increasing numbers of bumblebees stay more faithful to these flowers, even if they become a suboptimal choice in terms of reward. These results demonstrate that alkaloids enhance pollinator flower constancy, opening new perspectives in co-evolutionary process between plants and pollinators.

Indexed as

LearningAnimalsBeesBiological EvolutionNicotinePlant NectarPollinationNicotinePlant Nectar

Identifiers

PMID28512323
PMCPMC5434031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.