Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28512081›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Effects of eHealth Literacy on General Practitioner Consultations: A Mediation Analysis.

Peter Johannes Schulz, Mary Anne Fitzpatrick, Alexandra Hess, Lynn Sudbury-Riley, Uwe Hartung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter Johannes SchulzInstitute of Communication and Health, Faculty of Communication Science, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-2284
Mary Anne FitzpatrickWaikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9591-6334
Alexandra HessSchool of Communication, Journalism and Marketing, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1889-9539
Lynn Sudbury-RileyUniversity of Liverpool Management School, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5097-3407
Uwe HartungInstitute of Communication and Health, Faculty of Communication Science, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7089-6277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost evidence (not all) points in the direction that individuals with a higher level of health literacy will less frequently utilize the health care system than individuals with lower levels of health literacy. The underlying reasons of this effect are largely unclear, though people's ability to seek health information independently at the time of wide availability of such information on the Internet has been cited in this context.

objectiveWe propose and test two potential mediators of the negative effect of eHealth literacy on health care utilization: (1) health information seeking and (2) gain in empowerment by information seeking.

methodsData were collected in New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States using a Web-based survey administered by a company specialized on providing online panels. Combined, the three samples resulted in a total of 996 baby boomers born between 1946 and 1965 who had used the Internet to search for and share health information in the previous 6 months. Measured variables include eHealth literacy, Internet health information seeking, the self-perceived gain in empowerment by that information, and the number of consultations with one's general practitioner (GP). Path analysis was employed for data analysis.

resultsWe found a bundle of indirect effect paths showing a positive relationship between health literacy and health care utilization: via health information seeking (Path 1), via gain in empowerment (Path 2), and via both (Path 3). In addition to the emergence of these indirect effects, the direct effect of health literacy on health care utilization disappeared.

conclusionsThe indirect paths from health literacy via information seeking and empowerment to GP consultations can be interpreted as a dynamic process and an expression of the ability to find, process, and understand relevant information when that is necessary.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth LiteracyHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicinebaby boomerseHealth literacyhealth care utilizationhealth empowermenthealth literacyinformation seeking

Identifiers

PMID28512081
PMCPMC5449647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.