Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28511691›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

Tomato root microbiota and Phytophthora parasitica-associated disease.

Marie Larousse, Corinne Rancurel, Camille Syska, Ferran Palero, Catherine Etienne, Benoît Industri, Xavier Nesme, Marc Bardin, Eric Galiana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Root microbiota alters response to root rot inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marie LarousseUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Corinne RancurelUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Camille SyskaUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Ferran PaleroUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Catherine EtienneUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Benoît IndustriUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Xavier NesmeUniversité de Lyon, UCBL, CNRS, INRA, Ecologie Microbienne (LEM), 69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Marc BardinPlant Pathology, INRA, 84140, Montfavet, France.
Eric GalianaUniversité Côte d'Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, France. eric.galiana@inra.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7777-4173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInteractions between pathogenic oomycetes and microbiota residing on the surface of the host plant root are unknown, despite being critical to inoculum constitution. The nature of these interactions was explored for the polyphagous and telluric species Phytophthora parasitica.

resultsComposition of the rhizospheric microbiota of Solanum lycopersicum was characterized using deep re-sequencing of 16S rRNA gene to analyze tomato roots either free of or partly covered with P. parasitica biofilm. Colonization of the host root surface by the oomycete was associated with a shift in microbial community involving a Bacteroidetes/Proteobacteria transition and Flavobacteriaceae as the most abundant family. Identification of members of the P. parasitica-associated microbiota interfering with biology and oomycete infection was carried out by screening for bacteria able to (i) grow on a P. parasitica extract-based medium (ii), exhibit in vitro probiotic or antibiotic activity towards the oomycete (iii), have an impact on the oomycete infection cycle in a tripartite interaction S. lycopersicum-P. parasitica-bacteria. One Pseudomonas phylotype was found to exacerbate disease symptoms in tomato plants. The lack of significant gene expression response of P. parasitica effectors to Pseudomonas suggested that the increase in plant susceptibility was not associated with an increase in virulence. Our results reveal that Pseudomonas spp. establishes commensal interactions with the oomycete. Bacteria preferentially colonize the surface of the biofilm rather than the roots, so that they can infect plant cells without any apparent infection of P. parasitica.

conclusionsThe presence of the pathogenic oomycete P. parasitica in the tomato rhizosphere leads to a shift in the rhizospheric microbiota composition. It contributes to the habitat extension of Pseudomonas species mediated through a physical association between the oomycete and the bacteria.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalGene Expression Regulation, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaPhylogenyPhytophthoraPlant DiseasesPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASolanum lycopersicumSymbiosisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBiofilmFlavobacteriaceaeHost plantMetagenomics 16SOomycetePseudomonadaceae

Identifiers

PMID28511691
PMCPMC5434524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.