Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28511648›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2017

A mathematical model of mechanotransduction reveals how mechanical memory regulates mesenchymal stem cell fate decisions.

Tao Peng, Linan Liu, Adam L MacLean, Chi Wut Wong, Weian Zhao, Qing Nie

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cell-matrix feedback controls stretch-induced cellular memory and fibroblast activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. To be or not to be - Decoding the Trabecular Meshwork Cell Identity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Implications of Cellular Mechanical Memory in Bioengineering.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tao PengDepartment of Mathematics, Center for Complex Biological Systems, and Center for Mathematical and Computational Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Linan LiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biological Chemistry, Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center & Edwards Life sciences Center for Advanced Cardiovascular Technology, University of California, 845 Health Sciences Road, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Adam L MacLeanDepartment of Mathematics, Center for Complex Biological Systems, and Center for Mathematical and Computational Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Chi Wut WongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biological Chemistry, Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center & Edwards Life sciences Center for Advanced Cardiovascular Technology, University of California, 845 Health Sciences Road, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Weian ZhaoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Biological Chemistry, Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Research Center, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center & Edwards Life sciences Center for Advanced Cardiovascular Technology, University of California, 845 Health Sciences Road, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Qing NieDepartment of Mathematics, Center for Complex Biological Systems, and Center for Mathematical and Computational Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. qnie@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-3368
Edwards Lifesciences (United States) · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Uncover Strategies Used By Biological SystemsP50GM076516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI NIE, QING · 2007 to 2016
$25.1M
Spatial Dynamics of Tissue and Organ Size ControlR01NS095355 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CALOF, ANNE LEIGHTON, LANDER, ARTHUR D · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
Stochastic Dynamics and Noise Control in Patterning SystemsR01GM107264 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI NIE, QING, SCHILLING, THOMAS F · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076516NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107264NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical and biophysical properties of the cellular microenvironment regulate cell fate decisions. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) fate is influenced by past mechanical dosing (memory), but the mechanisms underlying this process have not yet been well defined. We have yet to understand how memory affects specific cell fate decisions, such as the differentiation of MSCs into neurons, adipocytes, myocytes, and osteoblasts.

resultsWe study a minimal gene regulatory network permissive of multi-lineage MSC differentiation into four cell fates. We present a continuous model that is able to describe the cell fate transitions that occur during differentiation, and analyze its dynamics with tools from multistability, bifurcation, and cell fate landscape analysis, and via stochastic simulation. Whereas experimentally, memory has only been observed during osteogenic differentiation, this model predicts that memory regions can exist for each of the four MSC-derived cell lineages. We can predict the substrate stiffness ranges over which memory drives differentiation; these are directly testable in an experimental setting. Furthermore, we quantitatively predict how substrate stiffness and culture duration co-regulate the fate of a stem cell, and we find that the feedbacks from the differentiating MSC onto its substrate are critical to preserve mechanical memory. Strikingly, we show that re-seeding MSCs onto a sufficiently soft substrate increases the number of cell fates accessible.

conclusionsControl of MSC differentiation is crucial for the success of much-lauded regenerative therapies based on MSCs. We have predicted new memory regions that will directly impact this control, and have quantified the size of the memory region for osteoblasts, as well as the co-regulatory effects on cell fates of substrate stiffness and culture duration. Taken together, these results can be used to develop novel strategies to better control the fates of MSCs in vitro and following transplantation.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaMechanotransduction, CellularModels, BiologicalBiomechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell LineageFeedback, PhysiologicalGene Regulatory NetworksMesenchymal Stem CellsBistabilityCell fate decisionECMMathematical modelingMemoryMesenchymal stem cellNonlinear dynamicsStiffness sensingYAP/TAZ

Identifiers

PMID28511648
PMCPMC5434622
OpenAlexW2614675684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.