Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28511553›Full record

Trial reportClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis2018

Whole Blood Platelet Aggregation Test and Prediction of Hemostatic Difficulty After Tooth Extraction in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy.

Yasushi Nagao, Rikuo Masuda, Akane Ando, Mutsumi Nonaka, Akiko Nishimura, Kinuko Goto, Yasubumi Maruoka, Takehiko Iijima

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Confounders for Prediction of Hemostatic Difficulty After Tooth Extraction in Patients Taking Antiplatelet Therapy.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasushi Nagao1 Division of Community-Based Comprehensive Dentistry, Department of Special Needs Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Rikuo Masuda2 Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Perioperative Medicine, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Akane Ando2 Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Perioperative Medicine, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Mutsumi Nonaka2 Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Perioperative Medicine, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Akiko Nishimura2 Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Perioperative Medicine, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Kinuko Goto2 Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Perioperative Medicine, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Yasubumi Maruoka1 Division of Community-Based Comprehensive Dentistry, Department of Special Needs Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Takehiko Iijima2 Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Perioperative Medicine, School of Dentistry, Showa University, Shinagawa, Japan.
Showa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When patients on antiplatelet therapy (APT) require minor invasive surgery, APT is usually continued to limit the risk of thrombosis. However, the possibility of hemostatic difficulties necessitates the monitoring of platelet aggregation to prevent unexpected bleeding. We examined whether whole blood aggregometry as a point-of-care testing (POCT) could be useful as a tool for predicting hemostatic difficulties. Sixty-five patients receiving APT and 15 patients who were not receiving APT were enrolled in the present study; all patients were scheduled to undergo a tooth extraction. Whole blood samples were obtained and were examined using multiple electrode aggregometry. The aggregometry was performed using arachidonic acid (AA), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and thrombin receptor activating peptide. Hemostatic difficulty was defined as a need for more than 10 minutes of compression to achieve hemostasis. The AA test results were significantly lower in patients treated with aspirin (control: 97.7 [29.0] U, aspirin: 14.5 [7.2] U, P < .001). The ADP test results were also significantly lower in patients treated with a P2Y

Indexed as

Tooth ExtractionAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHemostasisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet AggregationPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Function TestsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsplatelet aggregationplatelet aggregation inhibitorspoint-of-care testingpurinergic P2Y12 receptor antagoniststooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID28511553
PMCPMC6714625
OpenAlexW2615735790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.