Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510831›Full record

ArticleBotanical studies2015

Distribution of new satellites and simple sequence repeats in annual and perennial Glycine species.

Hsuan Chen, Mei-Chu Chung, Yuan-Ching Tsai, Fu-Jin Wei, Jaw-Shu Hsieh, Yue-Ie C Hsing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Botanical studies, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hsuan ChenInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Mei-Chu ChungInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Yuan-Ching TsaiInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Fu-Jin WeiInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan.
Jaw-Shu HsiehDepartment of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Yue-Ie C HsingInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 115, Taiwan. bohsing@gate.sinica.edu.tw.
Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica · TWNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repeat sequences occupied more than 50 % of soybean genome. In order to understand where these repeat sequences distributed in soybean genome and its related Glycine species, we examined three new repeat sequences-soybean repeat sequence (SBRS1, SBRS2 and SBRS3), some nonspecific repeat sequences and 45S rDNA on several Glycine species, including annual and perennial accessions in this study. In the annual species, G. soja, signals for SBRS1 and ATT repeat can be found on each chromosome in GG genome, but those for SBRS2 and SBRS3 were located at three specific loci. In perennial Glycine species, these three SBR repeat frequently co-localized with 45S rDNA, two major 45S rDNA loci were found in all tetraploid species. However, an extra minor locus was found in one accession of the G. pescadrensis (Tab074), but not in another accession (Tab004). We demonstrate that some repetitive sequences are present in all Glycine species used in the study, but the abundancy is different in annual or perennial species. We suggest this study may provide additional information in investigations of the phylogeny in the Glycine species.

Indexed as

45S rDNAChromosome markersFISHGlycineRepeat sequenceSSRs

Identifiers

PMID28510831
PMCPMC5430363
OpenAlexW1922291373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.