ArticleJournal of vision2017
Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry.
Article in Journal of vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptual resolution of ambiguity: A divisive normalization account for both interocular color grouping and difference enhancement.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Effects of interocular grouping demands on binocular rivalry.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Neural Dynamics during Binocular Rivalry: Indications from Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Ambiguity is a linking feature for interocular grouping.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- Binocularly-driven competing neural responses and the perceptual resolution of color.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Neural representations of perceptual color experience in the human ventral visual pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Seeing fruit on trees: enhanced perceptual dissimilarity from multiple ambiguous neural representations.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020Article
- Grouping ambiguous neural representations: neither identical chromaticity (the stimulus) nor color (the percept) is necessary.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020Article
- Ambiguous chromatic neural representations: Perceptual resolution by grouping.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2019Article
- Perceptual resolution of ambiguous neural representations for form and chromaticity.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- The Importance of the Interaction Between Ocular Motor Function and Vision During Human Infancy.Annual review of vision science · 2019Review
- Perceptual resolution of color for multiple chromatically ambiguous objects.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interocular-switch rivalry (also known as stimulus rivalry) is a kind of binocular rivalry in which two rivalrous images are swapped between the eyes several times a second. The result is stable periods of one image and then the other, with stable intervals that span many eye swaps (Logothetis, Leopold, & Sheinberg, 1996). Previous work used this close kin of binocular rivalry with rivalrous forms. Experiments here test whether chromatic interocular-switch rivalry, in which the swapped stimuli differ in only chromaticity, results in slow alternation between two colors. Swapping equiluminant rivalrous chromaticities at 3.75 Hz resulted in slow perceptual color alternation, with one or the other color often continuously visible for two seconds or longer (during which there were 15+ eye swaps). A well-known theory for sustained percepts from interocular-switch rivalry with form is inhibitory competition between binocular neurons driven by monocular neurons with matched orientation tuning in each eye; such binocular neurons would produce a stable response when a given orientation is swapped between the eyes. A similar model can account for the percepts here from chromatic interocular-switch rivalry and is underpinned by the neurophysiological finding that color-preferring binocular neurons are driven by monocular neurons from each eye with well-matched chromatic selectivity (Peirce, Solomon, Forte, & Lennie, 2008). In contrast to chromatic interocular-switch rivalry, luminance interocular-switch rivalry with swapped stimuli that differ in only luminance did not result in slowly alternating percepts of different brightnesses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.