Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510355›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2017

The National Landscape of Living Kidney Donor Follow-Up in the United States.

M L Henderson, A G Thomas, A Shaffer, A B Massie, X Luo, C M Holscher, T S Purnell, K L Lentine, D L Segev

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03400085 (Pilot Study of a Mobile Health Intervention for Living Donor Follow-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03400085 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of a Mobile Health Intervention for Living Donor Follow-up

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2018 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsLiving Donors, Nephrectomy, KidneyArmsmHealth application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Living Kidney Donors' Residential Neighborhoods: Driver or Barrier of Postdonation Follow-Up?American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-term Care of Living Kidney Donors Needs a Better Model of Healthcare Delivery.Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Telemedicine services for living kidney donation: A US survey of multidisciplinary providers.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Current Perspectives in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant.Journal of inflammation research · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M L HendersonDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
A G ThomasDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
A ShafferDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
A B MassieDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
X LuoDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
C M HolscherDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
T S PurnellDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
K L LentineCenter for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
D L SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007309 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 1985 to 2019
$43.2M
Long-Term Health Outcomes After Live Kidney Donation in African AmericansR01DK096008 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2013 to 2017
$3.8M
Patient Oriented Research in Kidney Disease and Transplant SurgeryK24DK101828 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2014 to 2018
$922k
Determinants of chronic kidney disease in African-American live kidney donorsK01DK101677 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MASSIE, ALLAN B · 2015 to 2019
$789k
Patient-Centered Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Access to Kidney TransplantationK01HS024600 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PURNELL, TANJALA · 2016 to 2020
$786k
Trajectory of post-donation renal function in living kidney donorsF32DK109662 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HOLSCHER, COURTENAY · 2016 to 2018
$232k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS024600NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK109662NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK101677NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK101828NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK096008NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2013, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/ United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) mandated that transplant centers collect data on living kidney donors (LKDs) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postdonation, with policy-defined thresholds for the proportion of complete living donor follow-up (LDF) data submitted in a timely manner (60 days before or after the expected visit date). While mandated, it was unclear how centers across the country would perform in meeting thresholds, given potential donor and center-level challenges of LDF. To better understand the impact of this policy, we studied Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for 31,615 LKDs between January 2010 and June 2015, comparing proportions of complete and timely LDF form submissions before and after policy implementation. We also used multilevel logistic regression to assess donor- and center-level characteristics associated with complete and timely LDF submissions. Complete and timely 2-year LDF increased from 33% prepolicy (January 2010 through January 2013) to 54% postpolicy (February 2013 through June 2015) (p < 0.001). In an adjusted model, the odds of 2-year LDF increased by 22% per year prepolicy (p < 0.001) and 23% per year postpolicy (p < 0.001). Despite these annual increases in LDF, only 43% (87/202) of centers met the OPTN/UNOS-required 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year LDF thresholds for LKDs who donated in 2013. These findings motivate further evaluation of LDF barriers and the optimal approaches to capturing outcomes after living donation.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsRegistriesTissue and Organ ProcurementAdolescentAdultAgedContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisethics and public policyhealth services and outcomes researchkidney transplantation: living donorkidney transplantation/nephrologyOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)

Identifiers

PMID28510355
PMCPMC5690895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.