Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510228›Full record

ArticleBiophysical reviews2015

Oriented samples: a tool for determining the membrane topology and the mechanism of action of cationic antimicrobial peptides by solid-state NMR.

Matthieu Fillion, Michèle Auger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthieu FillionDepartment of Chemistry, Regroupement québécois de recherche sur la fonction, la structure et l'ingénierie des protéines (PROTEO), Centre de recherche sur les matériaux avancés (CERMA), Centre québécois sur les matériaux fonctionnels (CQMF), Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Michèle AugerDepartment of Chemistry, Regroupement québécois de recherche sur la fonction, la structure et l'ingénierie des protéines (PROTEO), Centre de recherche sur les matériaux avancés (CERMA), Centre québécois sur les matériaux fonctionnels (CQMF), Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. michele.auger@chm.ulaval.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overuse and misuse of antibiotics have led bacteria to acquire several mechanisms of resistance. In response to this, researchers have identified natural antimicrobial peptides as promising candidates to fight against multiresistant bacteria. However, their mode of action is still unclear, and a better understanding of the mode of action of these peptides is of primary importance to develop new peptides displaying high antibacterial activity and low hemolytic activity. One of the main features that defines the mechanism of action is the membrane topology of the peptide. Among the spectroscopic techniques, solid-state NMR is the technique of choice for determining the location of the peptide within the membrane. It can be achieved by performing experiments with oriented samples. In the literature, the two most common types of oriented samples are bicelles and phospholipids mechanically oriented between glass plates. The mode of perturbation of the membrane-active peptide can be studied by phosphorus-31 and deuterium NMR. On the other hand, several experiments such as nitrogen-15 and fluorine solid-state NMR, that require labeled peptides, can give valuable information on the membrane topology of the peptide. The combination of the latter techniques allows the determination of a precise topology, thus a better knowledge of the molecular determinants involved in the membrane interactions of antimicrobial peptides.

Indexed as

Cationic antimicrobial peptidesMembrane topologyModel membranesOriented samplesSolid-state NMR

Identifiers

PMID28510228
PMCPMC5425733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.