Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510220›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2016

The regulatory role of DNA supercoiling in nucleoprotein complex assembly and genetic activity.

Georgi Muskhelishvili, Andrew Travers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Nucleoid-associated proteins: molecular mechanisms in microbial adaptation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recollections of a Helmstetter Disciple.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Nucleosome destabilization by polyamines.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A reappraisal of the form - function problem. Theory and phenomenology.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Transcription of Bacterial Chromatin.Journal of molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgi MuskhelishviliJacobs University Bremen, 28759, Bremen, Germany.
Andrew TraversMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK. at534@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1920-5826
Constructor University · DEMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105178783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We argue that dynamic changes in DNA supercoiling in vivo determine both how DNA is packaged and how it is accessed for transcription and for other manipulations such as recombination. In both bacteria and eukaryotes, the principal generators of DNA superhelicity are DNA translocases, supplemented in bacteria by DNA gyrase. By generating gradients of superhelicity upstream and downstream of their site of activity, translocases enable the differential binding of proteins which preferentially interact with respectively more untwisted or more writhed DNA. Such preferences enable, in principle, the sequential binding of different classes of protein and so constitute an essential driver of chromatin organization.

Indexed as

Chromatin organizationDNA supercoilingDNA translocasesDNA untwistingDNA writhingSuperhelicity gradients

Identifiers

PMID28510220
PMCPMC5425797
OpenAlexW2555543108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.