Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510201›Full record

ReviewBotanical studies2017

Ultramafic geoecology of South and Southeast Asia.

M L Galey, A van der Ent, M C M Iqbal, N Rajakaruna

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Botanical studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Geological Substrate Effects onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. PhytoKeys · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Evolutionary Genomics of Serpentine Adaptation.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

M L GaleyCenter for Water and Environment, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, 55811, USA.
A van der EntCentre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
M C M IqbalPlant Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy, 20000, Sri Lanka.
N RajakarunaBiological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA. nrajakaruna@gmail.com.
California Polytechnic State University · USMinnesota Department of Natural Resources · USNational Institute of Fundamental Studies · LKThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, ultramafic outcrops are renowned for hosting floras with high levels of endemism, including plants with specialised adaptations such as nickel or manganese hyperaccumulation. Soils derived from ultramafic regoliths are generally nutrient-deficient, have major cation imbalances, and have concomitant high concentrations of potentially phytotoxic trace elements, especially nickel. The South and Southeast Asian region has the largest surface occurrences of ultramafic regoliths in the world, but the geoecology of these outcrops is still poorly studied despite severe conservation threats. Due to the paucity of systematic plant collections in many areas and the lack of georeferenced herbarium records and databased information, it is not possible to determine the distribution of species, levels of endemism, and the species most threatened. However, site-specific studies provide insights to the ultramafic geoecology of several locations in South and Southeast Asia. The geoecology of tropical ultramafic regions differs substantially from those in temperate regions in that the vegetation at lower elevations is generally tall forest with relatively low levels of endemism. On ultramafic mountaintops, where the combined forces of edaphic and climatic factors intersect, obligate ultramafic species and hyperendemics often occur. Forest clearing, agricultural development, mining, and climate change-related stressors have contributed to rapid and unprecedented loss of ultramafic-associated habitats in the region. The geoecology of the large ultramafic outcrops of Indonesia's Sulawesi, Obi and Halmahera, and many other smaller outcrops in South and Southeast Asia, remains largely unexplored, and should be prioritised for study and conservation.

Indexed as

AdaptationsConservationEdaphic endemismEdaphic floraExtreme environmentsGeobotanyMetal hyperaccumulatorsPlant–soil relationsSerpentine vegetationUltramafic plants

Identifiers

PMID28510201
PMCPMC5432931
OpenAlexW2604707796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.