Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510181›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2014

Integrins in development and cancer.

Luke R Anderson, Thomas W Owens, Matthew J Naylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrins in cancer stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke R AndersonDiscipline of Physiology & Bosch Institute, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Thomas W OwensDiscipline of Physiology & Bosch Institute, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Matthew J NaylorDiscipline of Physiology & Bosch Institute, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Room E212, Anderson Stuart Building (F13), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. matthew.naylor@sydney.edu.au.
University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The correct control of cell fate decisions is critical for metazoan development and tissue homeostasis. It is established that the integrin family of cell surface receptors regulate cell fate by mediating cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. However, our understanding of how the different family members control discrete aspects of cell biology, and how this varies between tissues and is temporally regulated, is still in its infancy. An emerging area of investigation aims to understand how integrins translate changes in tension in the surrounding microenvironment into biological responses. This is particularly pertinent due to changes in the mechanical properties of the ECM having been linked to diseases, such as cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of the roles integrins play in important developmental processes, such as proliferation, polarity, apoptosis, differentiation and maintenance of "stemness". We also discuss recent advances in integrin mechanobiology and highlight the involvement of integrins and aberrant ECM in cancer.

Indexed as

CancerCell fateExtracellular matrixIntegrinsMechanobiologyStem cells

Identifiers

PMID28510181
PMCPMC5418411
OpenAlexW2008783492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.