Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510157›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2013

Soft interactions and crowding.

Mohona Sarkar, Conggang Li, Gary J Pielak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the effects of excipients on complex coacervation.Journal of colloid and interface science · 2025
    Article
  6. A coarse-grained model for disordered proteins under crowded conditions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Crowding beyond excluded volume: A tale of two dimers.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  10. PEG-mCherry interactions beyond classical macromolecular crowding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Refined Protein-Sugar Interactions in the Martini Force Field.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ACS omega · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohona SarkarDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3290, USA.
Conggang LiKey Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Molecular and Atomic Physics, Wuhan Center for Magnetic Resonance, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430071, People's Republic of China.
Gary J PielakDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3290, USA. gary_pielak@unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intracellular milieu is complex, heterogeneous and crowded-an environment vastly different from dilute solutions in which most biophysical studies are performed. The crowded cytoplasm excludes about a third of the volume available to macromolecules in dilute solution. This excluded volume is the sum of two parts: steric repulsions and chemical interactions, also called soft interactions. Until recently, most efforts to understand crowding have focused on steric repulsions. Here, we summarize the results and conclusions from recent studies on macromolecular crowding, emphasizing the contribution of soft interactions to the equilibrium thermodynamics of protein stability. Despite their non-specific and weak nature, the large number of soft interactions present under many crowded conditions can sometimes overcome the stabilizing steric, excluded volume effect.

Indexed as

CrowdingExcluded volumeOsmolytesProtein stabilitySecond virial coefficientSynthetic polymers

Identifiers

PMID28510157
PMCPMC5418433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.