ReviewBiophysical reviews2013
Stochastic chemical kinetics : A review of the modelling and simulation approaches.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The diverse effects of side reactions on the persistence of autocatalytic cycles.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Determination of the latent geometry of atorvastatin pharmacokinetics by transfer entropy to identify bottlenecks.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Stochastic biological system-of-systems modelling for iPSC culture.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Thermodynamically consistent determination of free energies and rates in kinetic cycle models.Biophysical reports · 2023Article
- Thermodynamically consistent determination of free energies and rates in kinetic cycle models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Variability in Retinal Neuron Populations and Associated Variations in Mass Transport Systems of the Retina in Health and Aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- Single-molecule imaging and kinetic analysis of intermolecular polyoxometalate reactions.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Heterogeneity in VEGF Receptor-2 Mobility and Organization on the Endothelial Cell Surface Leads to Diverse Models of Activation by VEGF.Cell reports · 2020Article
- Phenotype-based probabilistic analysis of heterogeneous responses to cancer drugs and their combination efficacy.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Bayesian inference and comparison of stochastic transcription elongation models.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Concurrent reduction-adsorption of chromium using m-phenylenediamine-modified magnetic chitosan: kinetics, isotherm, and mechanism.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Agent-based computational model of retinal angiogenesis simulates microvascular network morphology as a function of pericyte coverage.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A review of the physical principles that are the ground of the stochastic formulation of chemical kinetics is presented along with a survey of the algorithms currently used to simulate it. This review covers the main literature of the last decade and focuses on the mathematical models describing the characteristics and the behavior of systems of chemical reactions at the nano- and micro-scale. Advantages and limitations of the models are also discussed in the light of the more and more frequent use of these models and algorithms in modeling and simulating biochemical and even biological processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.