ReviewBiophysical reviews2012
The use of biophysical proteomic techniques in advancing our understanding of diseases.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and prognostic tests in systemic lupus erythematosus.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of proteomic approaches in investigating diseases is continuing to expand and has started to provide answers to substantial gaps in our understanding of disease pathogenesis as well as in the development of effective strategies for the early diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Biophysical techniques form a crucial part of the advanced proteomic techniques currently used and include mass spectrometry and protein separation techniques, such as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and liquid chromatography. The application of biophysical proteomic techniques in the study of disease includes delineation of altered protein expression, not only at the whole-cell or tissue levels, but also in subcellular structures, protein complexes, and biological fluids. These techniques are also being used for the discovery of novel disease biomarkers, exploration of the pathogenesis of diseases, development of new diagnostic methodologies, and identification of new targets for therapeutics. Proteomic techniques also have the potential for accelerating drug development through more effective strategies for evaluating a specific drug's therapeutic effects and toxicity. This article discusses the application of biophysical proteomic techniques in delineating cardiovascular disease and other diseases, as well as the limitations and future research directions required for these techniques to gain greater acceptance and have a larger impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.