Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510083›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2017

Software for molecular docking: a review.

Nataraj S Pagadala, Khajamohiddin Syed, Jack Tuszynski

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 459 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
459citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
83.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

459 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,421 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. α-Mangostin attenuatesVirulence · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel Peptide-Triazole Conjugates: Strategic Synthesis, Antimicrobial Properties, and Molecular Docking Study.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Persistent Local Laplacian Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

399 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nataraj S PagadalaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology, 6-020 Katz Group Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada. nattu251@gmail.com.
Khajamohiddin SyedUnit for Drug Discovery Research, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, 9300, Free State, South Africa.
Jack TuszynskiDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CACentral University of Technology · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular docking methodology explores the behavior of small molecules in the binding site of a target protein. As more protein structures are determined experimentally using X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, molecular docking is increasingly used as a tool in drug discovery. Docking against homology-modeled targets also becomes possible for proteins whose structures are not known. With the docking strategies, the druggability of the compounds and their specificity against a particular target can be calculated for further lead optimization processes. Molecular docking programs perform a search algorithm in which the conformation of the ligand is evaluated recursively until the convergence to the minimum energy is reached. Finally, an affinity scoring function, ΔG [U total in kcal/mol], is employed to rank the candidate poses as the sum of the electrostatic and van der Waals energies. The driving forces for these specific interactions in biological systems aim toward complementarities between the shape and electrostatics of the binding site surfaces and the ligand or substrate.

Indexed as

Docking accuracyFlexible dockingRigid body docking

Identifiers

PMID28510083
PMCPMC5425816
OpenAlexW2578119541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.