Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28510062›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2011

Biological applications of second harmonic imaging.

Guy Cox

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous Label-Free Autofluorescence Multi-Harmonic Microscopy.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Multimodal Optical Imaging Platform for Studying Cellular Metabolism.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Biophysical reviews · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Nonlinear multispectral imaging for tumor delineation.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guy CoxAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. Guy.Cox@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) microscopy dates back to 1974, but effective biological use of the technique has a history of barely 10 years. It is now widely used to image collagen in many different applications, and is becoming useful for imaging myosin and some polysaccharides. A separate line on research has focussed on SHG dyes, which can provide high-speed indication of membrane potential and are now in use in neurobiology. This review looks at the progress to date in these different fields.

Indexed as

CollagenMyosinPolysaccharidesSecond Harmonic MicroscopySHGSHG dyes

Identifiers

PMID28510062
PMCPMC5425668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.