Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28509340›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2018

Platelet-rich fibrin-based matrices to improve angiogenesis in an in vitro co-culture model for bone tissue engineering.

Eva Dohle, Karima El Bagdadi, Robert Sader, Joseph Choukroun, C James Kirkpatrick, Shahram Ghanaati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva DohleFORM, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5504-6792
Karima El BagdadiFORM, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Robert SaderFORM, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Joseph ChoukrounFORM, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
C James KirkpatrickFORM, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Shahram GhanaatiFORM, Frankfurt Oral Regenerative Medicine, Clinic for Maxillofacial and Plastic Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of prevascularization strategies for tissue-engineering purposes, co-culture systems consisting of outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs) and primary osteoblasts (pOBs) have been established as a promising in vitro tool to study regeneration mechanisms and to identify factors that might positively influence repair processes such as wound healing or angiogenesis. The development of autologous injectable platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), which can be generated from peripheral blood in a minimal invasive procedure, fulfils several requirements for clinically applicable cell-based tissue-engineering strategies. During this study, the established co-culture system of OECs and pOBs was mixed with injectable PRF and was cultivated in vitro for 24 h or 7 days. The aim of this study was to analyse whether PRF might have a positive effect on wound healing processes and angiogenic activation of OECs in the co-culture with regard to proinflammatory factors, adhesion molecules and proangiogenic growth factor expression. Histological cell detection revealed the formation of lumina and microvessel-like structures in the PRF/co-culture complexes after 7 days of complex cultivation. Interestingly, the angiogenic activation of OECs was accompanied by an upregulation of wound healing-associated factors, as well as by a higher expression of the proangiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor, which was evaluated both on the mRNA level as well as on the protein level. Thus, PRF might positively influence wound healing processes, in particular angiogenesis, in the in vitro co-culture, making autologous PRF-based matrices a beneficial therapeutic tool for tissue-engineering purposes by simply profiting from the PRF, which contains blood plasma, platelets and leukocytes.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeovascularization, PhysiologicAlkaline PhosphataseBone and BonesBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Cell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesEndothelial CellsFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansInjectionsMaleMicrovesselsOsteoblastsAlkaline PhosphataseBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aangiogenesisbone tissue engineeringendothelial progenitor cellsinflammationplatelet rich fibrinwound healing

Identifiers

PMID28509340
PMCPMC5888144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.