Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28508593›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2017

Missense variant pathogenicity predictors generalize well across a range of function-specific prediction challenges.

Vikas Pejaver, Sean D Mooney, Predrag Radivojac

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04750330 (Mitochondrial DNA and Nuclear SNPs to Predict Severity of COVID-19 Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04750330 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Mitochondrial DNA and Nuclear SNPs to Predict Severity of COVID-19 Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled394ConditionsCovid19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Accurate identification and mechanistic evaluation of pathogenic missense variants withProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comprehensive characterization of amino acid positions in protein structures reveals molecular effect of missense variants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vikas PejaverDepartment of Computer Science and Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-1943-0284
Sean D MooneyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-0833
Predrag RadivojacDepartment of Computer Science and Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.

Funding

Informatic Profiling of Clinically Relevant MutationR01LM009722 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOONEY, SEAN DAVID · 2007 to 2014
$3.5M
Component 2 - Resource ProjectU41HG007346 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BRENNER, STEVEN E · 2015 to 2017
$1.7M
A computational framework for predicting the impact of mutations in autismR01MH105524 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IAKOUCHEVA, LILIA M, RADIVOJAC, PREDRAG · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation ConferenceR13HG006650 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BRENNER, STEVEN E · 2011 to 2018
$165k
NHGRI NIH HHS R13 HG006650NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007346NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105524NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The steady advances in machine learning and accumulation of biomedical data have contributed to the development of numerous computational models that assess the impact of missense variants. Different methods, however, operationalize impact differently. Two common tasks in this context are the prediction of the pathogenicity of variants and the prediction of their effects on a protein's function. These are related but distinct problems, and it is unclear whether methods developed for one are optimized for the other. The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI) experiment provides a means to address this question empirically. To this end, we participated in various protein-specific challenges in CAGI with two objectives in mind. First, to compare the performance of methods in the MutPred family with the state-of-the-art. Second and more importantly, to investigate the applicability of general-purpose pathogenicity predictors to the classification of specific function-altering variants without additional training or calibration. We find that our pathogenicity predictors performed competitively with other methods, outputting score distributions in agreement with experimental outcomes. Overall, we conclude that binary classifiers learned from disease-causing mutations are capable of modeling important aspects of the underlying biology and the alteration of protein function resulting from mutations.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMachine LearningProteinsProteinsCAGI, functional effect prediction, generalization, machine learning, MutPredMutPred2, pathogenicity prediction, severity

Identifiers

PMID28508593
PMCPMC5561458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.